The tidy lines of journalism are blurred.
A once black and white indusÂtry printÂed withÂout room for rebutÂtal now lays at the crossÂroads of conÂtent creÂation and marÂketÂing madÂness. JourÂnalÂists canÂnot seem to find sufÂfiÂcient pay for work. StoÂries get disÂreÂgardÂed. How did this happen?
It is not as closeÂly linked to our recent boom in digÂiÂtal media as you might think. In fact, the jourÂnalÂism indusÂtry faced its first game-changÂing chalÂlenge with marÂketers in 1899.
Two men held the reigns of AmerÂiÂcan jourÂnalÂism in the late 19th cenÂtuÂry, and they led their respecÂtive troops in oppoÂsite directions.
Joseph Pulitzer of the New York World guidÂed his hunch for news with a strict sysÂtem of integriÂty. He covÂetÂed the authenÂtic, accuÂrate stoÂryÂtelling upon which AmerÂiÂcan jourÂnalÂism had built itself. His rival and felÂlow jourÂnalÂisÂtic troop leader, William RanÂdolph Hearst of the New York JourÂnal, was folÂlowÂing a difÂferÂent set of hunches.
Hearst and his limÂitÂless budÂget were in the game to make his paper rise to the top of the marÂket and be the only paper to which the pubÂlic needÂed to pay notice. He enticed Pulitzer’s writÂers with genÂerÂous salaries; he dropped the price of his paper to comÂpetÂiÂtiveÂly weakÂen the New York World; stoÂries ran before sources and plot details were conÂfirmed beyond doubt. Pulitzer tried to hold tight to his ideÂalÂisÂtic vision of jourÂnalÂism, but let down his guard more and more often as the two pubÂliÂcaÂtions raced for readership.
Cue the SpanÂish-AmerÂiÂcan War and America’s obsesÂsion with it. Funds are poured into both pubÂliÂcaÂtions so irreÂsponÂsiÂbly to win favoritism amongst the pubÂlic; the only conÂceivÂable budÂget fix is to raise the price for and disÂtriÂbÂuÂtion demands of newsÂboys. It didn’t take long for a group of the impovÂerÂished young workÂers – 5,000 of them, actuÂalÂly- to ban togethÂer and go on strike against the new expecÂtaÂtions. Protests in the BrookÂlyn Bridge drew attenÂtion to one of the most prevaÂlent affairs in jourÂnalÂism and child labor.
CirÂcuÂlaÂtion came to a screechÂing halt. The boys refused to budge until their demands were met- and they were. WithÂin two weeks, both the World and the JourÂnal paid their debts and Pulitzer, and Hearst were left with an unavoidÂable revÂeÂlaÂtion: withÂout marÂketÂing, there is no media.
Today, jourÂnalÂism and conÂtent marÂketÂing sit at the same opposÂing chairs that Pulitzer and Hearst once did.
And again, both stare at a cenÂterÂpiece on the table that reminds both that withÂout a savvy marÂketÂing stratÂeÂgy, a stoÂry is but words in a diary.
Every stoÂry needs a rep. IdeÂalÂly, every stoÂry needs a task force of reps whose misÂsion is to bring that stoÂry to as many peoÂple as posÂsiÂble. But there is this notion of oppoÂsiÂtion so heavy in the air above that table. JourÂnalÂism wants nothÂing to do with the inauÂthenÂtic tacÂtics of conÂtent marÂketers to reach more audiÂences. ConÂtent marÂketers don’t fulÂly underÂstand that the stubÂborn pasÂsion with which jourÂnalÂists pen their pages is the soul of writÂing that keeps readÂers wantÂiÂng to digest more.
Journalism and content marketing are at the same table.
They’re in the same busiÂness, and they need to be workÂing togethÂer. JourÂnalÂists need the insight of digÂiÂtal marÂketÂing experts, and conÂtent creÂation comÂpaÂnies need the writÂing and research experÂtise of journalists.
We are beyond embracÂing the idea that both sides of the table can help each othÂer rise to the top. JourÂnalÂists and conÂtent marÂketers need to work togethÂer to keep reportÂing and stoÂryÂtelling alive. JourÂnalÂists need to adopt a thorÂough underÂstandÂing of media disÂtriÂbÂuÂtion, how to reach audiÂences, when to push conÂtent, at what preÂcise moment to make a stoÂry go viral.
Content marketers need to take writing seriously.
Research precedes concept and story override word count criteria.
ConÂtent marÂketÂing is well readÂied for the enterÂtainÂment-driÂven media and news conÂsumpÂtion we live amidst today. MarÂketÂing geniusÂes know exactÂly when to throw a stoÂry to the pubÂlic. Through which mediÂums their audiÂences will most quickÂly digest it. When to supÂpleÂment a piece with othÂer platÂforms. Where to take the lifeÂline of a tale.
Today, stories never die. They’re recycled, retweeted, repeated and referenced six months down the line.
ConÂtent marÂketÂing conÂtinÂues to evolve in the cleverÂest ways, and it puts them at an unbeatÂable advanÂtage for conÂtent absorpÂtion. Once you masÂter who to reach, when and where, the how to reach an audiÂence opens itself up to an InfiniÂtum of innoÂvÂaÂtive possibilities.
But there’s still one element missing. The why.
Why are you reachÂing out to your audiÂence? Why do you want to bring them a stoÂry? It can’t be limÂitÂed to delivÂerÂing conÂtent that driÂves sales. What feeds your conÂsumer? What makes them excitÂed about the world? DevelÂop an interÂest in a new subÂject? Why can’t you be that source that brings them everyÂthing they need to know and imagÂine about life? You can! Enter the journalist.
A jourÂnalÂist underÂstands a readÂer in a way that a conÂtent marÂketer does not. JourÂnalÂists speak heart to heart. They know the clues in a stoÂry that paint a picÂture for a readÂer and to which takeÂaway a readÂer will conÂnect. A jourÂnalÂist finds the stoÂry withÂin the stoÂry; the one that grips the readÂer and gives them the purÂpose for learnÂing about a worldÂly event greater than stayÂing in the know.
By adoptÂing a colÂlabÂoÂraÂtive menÂtalÂiÂty, jourÂnalÂists and conÂtent marÂketers can take the world by storm, keepÂing the massÂes well-eduÂcatÂed and well-enterÂtained. JourÂnalÂists have startÂed to stradÂdle both news and brand sides of conÂtent, betÂter equipÂping the incomÂing genÂerÂaÂtions of writÂers to report with a marÂketÂing instinct.
It isn’t sellÂing out. It’s linkÂing up and makÂing sellÂing posÂsiÂble so that we can ensure that shrewd reportÂing and stoÂryÂtelling nevÂer die.